High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as it had become infructuous after the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 1445 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 1445 OF 2017 (GM-AC)
BETWEEN:
A. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE ADINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A NO.498/18 ADHILAKSHMI NILAYA SUBHASH NAGAR MAIN ROAD NELAMANGALA BENGALURU-560002.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKSHIT K N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: High Court of Karnataka
R1 AND 2 ARE R/A NO.186 ATTUR LAYOUT, YELAHANAK BENGALURU-560044.
WP No. 1445 of 2017
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. A N KRISHNA SWAMY FOR R3., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED XII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT DATED 14.10.2016 ON I.A. UNDER ORDER XVI RULE 20 AND 21 OF CPC MVC.NO.1479/2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AWARD COSTS AND LITIGATION EXPENSES.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
prayer made in the petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks leave of the court to withdraw the petition.
Accepting the submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
A. KRISHNAPPA
M.D. NARAYANASWAMY
SMT. SUJATHA
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
