Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226/227 to quash an impugned order. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the submission that the matter had been settled amicably.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 6374 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6374 OF 2019 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJARAMA S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. SRINIVASA., ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRYAING TO QUASH THE
WP No. 6374 of 2019
IMPUGNED ORDER ON IA NO.2 DATED 21.12.2018 WHICH WAS ALLOWED IN PART, BY THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT, HASSAN, VIDE ANNEXURE – D AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
"It is submitted that, in the instant case, the Petitioner is seeking permission from this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the Petition as the parties have settled the matter amicably. Hence the continuation of proceedings infructous."
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SJK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52
Sri. S. Raviprasad
Smt. Megha
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
