The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging a bank notice as infructuous due to efflux of time following the auction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 1219 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 1219 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.HARISH KUMAR M S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
WP No. 1219 of 2022
NOTICE DATED 10.12.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE – A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petition is rendered infructuous due to efflux of time as the impugned auction has spent itself.
Petition is disposed off as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71
MR. UMSHANKAR D.
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, UNION BANK OF INDIA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
