In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the court disposed of a plea by applicants seeking to convert temporary electricity connections to permanent ones after the respondents rejected the request.
Petition disposed of as relief did not survive consideration; liberty granted to file a fresh application per regulations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION No.6155 OF 2022 (GM - KEB)
BETWEEN :
2
SITUATED AT MYLASANDRA, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK – 560 068. 4. SRI. S. JAGADEESH, S/O SHEKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, SITE NO.659/1, SHRE RENUKA YELLAMMA BLOCK, KATHA NO.659/1/215, PROPERTY NO.215, SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099. 5. SRI. UDAY KUMAR SHETTY, S/O KALAPPA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SITE NO.638, (SHREE RENUKAYELLAMMA BLOCK), KATHA NO.638/124, PROPERTY NO.124, SITUATED AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 068. 6. SRI. B. R. SANJAY, S/O RAJU BORE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, SITE NO.641, (SHREE RENUKAYELLAMMA BLOCK), KATHA NO.638/127, PROPERTY NO.127, SITUATED AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 068. 7. SRI. VENKATESH B.S., S/O B V SATHYANARAYANA,
3
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, SITE NO.259, (SHREE RENUKAYELLAMMA BLOCK), KATHA NO.259/124, PROPERTY NO.124, SITUATED AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 068.
4
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, SITE NO.617/123, PROPERTY NO.123, SITUATED AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 068.
5
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SITE NO.790, (SHREE RENUKA YELLAMMA BLOCK), KATHA NO.790/216, PROPERTY NO.216, SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099.
6
7
HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099.
8
9
BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 068. 30. MR. VIKRAM SIGH, S/O SHAMBHU SINGH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT SITE NO.759, SHREE RENUKA YELLAMMA BLOCK, KATHA NO.215, SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099. 31. MR. SATEESH, S/O EREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/A SITE NO.715, SHREE RENUKA YELLAMMA BLOCK, OLD KATHA NO.715, NEW KATHA NO.284, SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099. 32. SMT. SHANTHA M., W/O RAGHUVEER KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/A SITE NO.1135/1, SHREE RENUKA YELLAMMA BLOCK, KATHA NO.1135/1/218, SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099. 33. SMT. B. BHARATHI, W/O SRI S KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SITE NO.220, SHREE RENUKAYELLAMMA BLOCK, KATHA NO.200/123,
10
SITUATED AT MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099.
11
KATHA NO.1154/1A/218, SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 099.
(BY SRI.NAIK N.R., ADVOCATE)
AND :
12
J P NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 078.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.H.V.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT.JYOTHI BHAT, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CHANGE THE TEMPORARY CONNECTION OF ELECTRICITY POWER INTO PERMANENT CONNECTION OF ELECTRICITY POWER TO THE RESPECTIVE METERS OF THE PETITIONERS INSTALLED FOR THEIR RESIDENTIAL PREMISES OF APARTMENTS SITUATED AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, MYLASANDRA VILLAGE, HOMMADEVANAHALLI VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK FULLY DESCRIBED AS AT THE LIST WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-C AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the representation submitted by the petitioners for conversion of temporary connection into permanent connection has been rejected vide communication dated
13
01.06.2022 produced as Annexure-R1 to the statement of objections.
Sd/JUDGE
RKA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. NARAYANA NAIKA P. AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BESCOM
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
