The Bengaluru Development Authority filed a writ petition seeking boundary adjustments. The petitioner (GPA holder) sought withdrawal of proceedings after an endorsement confirmed their lands were not utilized for layout formation. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 6045 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 6045 OF 2021 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ROOPESHA B., AND SRI. M.K. SANDEEP, ADVOCATES)
Digitally signed by POORNIMA SHIVANNA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
WP No. 6045 of 2021
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO 4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 03.02.2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-T TO THE W.P. AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
WP No. 6045 of 2021
Sd/JUDGE
Prs*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. K. Raghava Reddy
Bengaluru Development Authority
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
