Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a land acquisition order. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous upon the respondent's submission that the impugned order had already been implemented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 51358 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 51358 OF 2016 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RANJITH K S.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by POORNIMA SHIVANNA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
WP No. 51358 of 2016
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJ H.T., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 STYLED AS ANAUPACHARIKA TIPPANI DTD.23.1.2015 VIDE ANNEXA; GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 STYLED AS ANAUPACHARIKA TIPPANI DTD.23.1.2015 VIDE ANNEX-A.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
WP No. 51358 of 2016
as infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
DS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI NOOR MOHAMMED SHARIFI
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
DEPUTY SECRETARY 1 DISTRIBUTION DIVISION
DEPUTY SECRETARY 3
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
