Writ petition filed for payment of unpaid bills and interest against Karnataka authorities. Court stayed proceedings upon verifying that the dues had already been disbursed via RTGS.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION No.5792 OF 2018(LB-RES)
BETWEEN :
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O T THIMMARAJU II CLASS CONTRACTOR POLENAHALLI VILLAGE DONIMODAGU POST, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563129.
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS S/O T MUNIRAJU II CLASS CONTRACTOR POLENAHALLI VILLAGE DONIMODAGU POST, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR-563129.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. T P VIVEKANANDA, ADV.)
AND
2
2 . ZILLA PANCHAYATH KOLAR-563101 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
3 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KOLAR ZILLA PANCHAYATH PANCHAYATH RAJ, ENGINEERING DIVISION KOLAR-563101.
4 . THE ASSISTAT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PRE SUB DIVISION KOLAR ZILLA PANCHAYATH KGF ROAD BANGARPET-563120.
5 . THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER PRE SUB DIVISION KOLAR ZILLA PANCHAYATH KGF ROAD BANGARPET-563120.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA. FOR R1: SRI. M. NARAYANA REDDY, ADV. FOR R2 & R5 )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR SIMILAR WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT Nos. 2 TO 5 TO PAY INTEREST @ 15% P.A. FROM 19.04.2013 TO 25.08.2016 IN RESPECT OF BILL AT ANNEXURE-G AND INTEREST FROM 19.04.2013 TO 07.10.2016 IN RESPECT OF BILL AT ANNEXURE-H IN VIEW OF DELAY IN MAKING PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR THE WORK EXECUTED BY PETITIONERS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARAY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for a direction to
respondent Nos.2 to 5 to make the payment of the bill
for the work executed by the petitioners.
has furnished the document to substantiate the claim that the amount due to the petitioners has already been disbursed through the RTGS.
In view of the above, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition
is disposed of .
Sd/JUDGE
HA/-
2 provisions across 1 enactments
T Ramu
M Gopinath
State of Karnataka
Zilla Panchayath Kolar
The Executive Engineer Kolar Zilla Panchayath
The Assistant Executive Engineer Pre Sub Division Kolar Zilla Panchayath
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
