Madegowda v. Tahasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to record khata on Schedule property per old orders. HCGP agreed to direct respondents to look into the grievance within six months.
What did the court decide?
Direct respondents to look into the petitioners' grievance regarding khata in six months.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.47536 OF 2015(LR)
BETWEEN:
- MADEGOWDA, S/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
- KARIGOWDA,
- S/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
- SAIBABU S/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT HANAKERE, KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.K.R.ANANTHA MURHTY,ADVOCATE)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the official respondents are bound to effectuate the Special Deputy Commissioner's 1966 and Deputy Commissioner's 1968 orders regarding khata in the names of the petitioners.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Made Gowda and others
- respondent
Tahasildar, Mandya Taluk
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner, Mandya Sub-Division
- respondent
Deputy Commissioner, Mandya District
- respondent
Chief Secretary, Government of Karnataka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/47536/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court