Sri M E Chandrappa v. Sri M E Basavaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged the trial Court's order rejecting an application by the defendant to produce details of immovable properties. The High Court held the burden lies on the defendant and dismissed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition is dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.4445 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
SRI M E CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE M ESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT “NISARGA” MIG 68, K H B COLONY GOPAL GOWDA EXTENSION SHIVAMOGGA-577 205.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SARITHA A L, ADVOCATE FOR SRI DODDAMANI RADHA VASANTA, ADVOCATE)
AND
- SRI M E BASAVARAJ S/O LATE ESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT “SUDARSHAN NILAYA” SHIVAPPA NAIKA EXTENSION 2ND CROSS, VINOBHA NAGAR SHIVAMOGGA-577 205.
- SMT. NARMADA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the trial Court's order rejecting an application to produce property documents.
Whether the burden lies on the defendant to furnish particulars of properties left out in the suit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SRI M E CHANDRAPPA
- respondent
SRI M E BASAVARAJ
- respondent
SMT. NARMADA
- respondent
KUM. AISHWARYA
- respondent
SMT. ANNAPOORNA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4445/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court