Allowed
Sri K. v. Naidu v the State by
Karnataka HCWP/43234/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
High Court quashed the FIR after reading a compromise petition indicating amicable settlement between parties for compoundable offences under the IPC.
What did the court decide?
The impugned FIR in Cr. No. 202/2017 is hereby quashed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
¶4
BEFORE
¶5
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
¶6
WRIT PETITION No.43234 OF 2018 (GM - RES)
¶7
BETWEEN :
¶8
- SRI. K. V. NAIDU, S/O K.C.NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, 4TH CROSS, GOWDARA COLONY, 1ST MAIN ROAD, RMV 2ND STAGE, DOLLARS COLONY, BENGALURU - 560 094.
¶9
- SRI. SANTHOSH RAI, S/O VITAL RAI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.2/172, BALAJI BELU HOUSE, BANTAWALA, MANGALURU.
¶10
...PETITIONERS
¶11
(BY SRI.NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE)
¶12
AND :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the impugned FIR should be quashed on account of settlement and compoundable nature of offences.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sri. K. V. Naidu
- petitioner
Sri. Santhosh Rai
- respondent
The State
- respondent
Mr. Mehamood Ayaz
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/43234/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court