M Thippesamy v. H C Indramma
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to quash an order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous due to the petitioner's acquittal before the trial court.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.53 OF 2019
BETWEEN :
M. THIPPESAMY, S/O MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, PWD CONTRACTOR AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O MADDAIAHNAHATTY VILLAGE, ADANUR POST, HOLALKERE TALUK - 577 526.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.R.SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE)
AND :
H.C. INDRAMMA, W/O B.T.HALASWAMY, AGED 41 YEARS, R/AT 2ND CROSS, SIDDARAMAPPA EXTENSION, HOLALKERE TOWN - 577 526.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Thippesamy
- respondent
H.C. Indramma
Coram
Hemant Chandangoudar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/53/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court