Petitioner challenged a transfer order. Counsel submitted the petition became infructuous as the petitioner retired from service. The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without further consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.40336/2016 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI SHIVANNA S/O LATE MADAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT (FDA), IN THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.4, KABINI CANAL INVESTIGATION (KCI) SUB DIVISION, T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571124 MYSURU DISTRICT
R/O NO.350, OPP. PUBLIC HOSPITAL TRIVENI NAGARA
T.NARASIPURA – 571 124 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.KESHAV R AGNIHOTRI, ADV.)
AND:
2
DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (WRDO) ANAND RAO CIRCLE BENGALURU-560009
T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571124
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.V.RAMESH JOIS, AGA FOR R1, R2 &R4,
R3, R5, R6 ARE SERVED)
+++++
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED TRANSFER ORDER DATED 15.07.2016 VIDE ANNEX-A AND ALLOW THE ABOVE W.P.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
3
ORDER
Learned counsel Sri.Keshav R Agnihotri for petitioner
submits that the petitioner retired from service and the writ petition would no more survive for consideration.
Placing the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner on record, the writ petition is disposed of as having
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
mpk/ -* CT: BR
Sri Shivanna S/o Late Madaiah
The State of Karnataka Rep. by the Prl. Secretary The Department of Water Resources Vikas Soudha Bengaluru
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
