Allowed

M/S Sree Balaji Plywoods v. the Income Tax Officer

Karnataka HC15 Sept 2022WP/1962/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court allowed a Writ Petition seeking quashing of an Income Tax Assessment Order and Demand Notice. The Court held that the Assessing Officer violated the principles of natural justice and Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by not providing an opportunity to the assessee to reply to queries before passing the order. The matter was remanded for affording a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Impugned Assessment Order and Demand Notice quashed; Order remitted as show-cause notice; Liberty reserved to submit reply within four weeks.

M/S Sree Balaji Plywoods Vs the Income Tax Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1962 OF 2020( T-IT)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

M/S SREE BALAJI PLYWOODS 119/1, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI ASHOK KUMAR S/O SRI MOHAN C AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

¶7

…PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SMT. VANI.H., ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6^TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095

¶11

…RESPONDENT *****

¶12

(BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)

¶13

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED: 30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT U/S 143(3) OF HTE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.

¶14

THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

¶15

²

¶16

ORDER

¶17

In this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned Assessment Order dated 30.12.2019 and the impugned Demand Notice dated 30.12.2019 passed by the respondent vide Annexures-D and E respectively and for other reliefs.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.

¶19

In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the Memorandum of Petition and referring to the documents produced by the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner invites my attention to the notice dated 08.08.2018 issued by the respondent under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the I.T. Act”) and in response thereto, the petitioner submitted a reply at Annexure-C dated 06.12.2019 along with all necessary enclosures. It is submitted that despite the petitioner submitting a reply along with all necessary details, the respondent has proceeded to issue the

¶20

³

¶21

impugned demand notice and Assessment Order at Annexures-D and E respectively, without providing any opportunity to the petitioner and without calling upon the petitioner to answer the queries and furnish necessary documents as regards details already furnished by him and the same is violative of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Section 68 of the I.T. Act and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition.

¶22

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶23

As rightly, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner, despite referring to the details/documents submitted by the petitioner along with reply dated 06.12.2019, the respondents have proceeded to pass the impugned Assessment Order without providing any opportunity to the petitioner as contemplated under Section 68 of the I.T. Act and consequently, the impugned order passed by the respondent being not only contrary to Section 68 of the I.T. Act, but also in violation of principles

¶24

⁴

¶25

of natural justice and hence, the impugned order/notice deserve to be quashed and the matter be remitted back to the respondent by treating the aforesaid impugned Assessment Order at Annexure-D as show-cause notice and provide an opportunity to the petitioner to submit its reply along with documents and to proceed further in accordance with law.

¶26

6. In the result, I pass the following:

¶27

ORDER

¶28

(i) The petition is hereby allowed .

¶29

(ii) The impugned Assessment Order dated 30.12.2019 and the Demand Notice dated 30.12.2019 passed by the respondent vide Annexures-D and E respectively are hereby quashed.

¶30

(iii) The impugned Assessment Order at Annexure-D is directed to be treated as show-cause notice, to which liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit

¶31

⁵

¶32

his reply within four weeks along with necessary documents.

¶33

(iv) Upon receipt of the said response/reply by the petitioner along with documents, the respondent shall provide an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and

¶34

proceed thereafter in accordance with law.

¶35

Sd/JUDGE

¶36

Bmc

M/S Sree Balaji Plywoods v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Sree Balaji Plywoods v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Mohith R S Vs the Principal

Nebula Technologies Vs Treistek Technologies LLP

Suresh Kumar Kothari Vs the Income Tax Officer

Medi Assist Insurance Tpa Private Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Tds)

M/S. Manyta International School Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Srigandha Souhardha Credit Vs the Union of India