Sri Raamanath Hegde v. the National Co-Operative Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
NO.14617 OF 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
NO.14617 OF 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP NO.14617 OF 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14617 OF 2018 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAAMANATH HEGDE S/O LATE MANJUNATH HEGDE AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S PACTEC INDIA, NO.238/1, 5TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR VISHAL MEGA MART, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560 018.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.73/1, GANDHI BAZAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 004. REP. BY THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI. ARUN BANGERA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REMOVE THE LOCK KEPT BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE SCHEDULE PREMISES TO THE PETITIONER; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
WP NO.14617 OF 2018
O R D E R
The petitioner has sought for following relief:
“Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that, this Hon’ble Court be pleaded to issue Writ of Mandamus by directing the respondent to remove the lock kept by the respondent to the schedule premises to the petitioner and grant such other relief/s as the Hon’ble Court deems fit in circumstances and facts of the case in the interest of justice and equity.”
SD/JUDGE
ARK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. RAAMANATH HEGDE
THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
E.S. INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court