The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution despite the petitioner availing four opportunities to proceed with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.14544 OF 2016 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
2 . KUMARI RACHANA D/O T V RAVISHANKAR AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER ANITH B M BOTH R/O NO.594 NRUPATHUNGA NAGARA BANGALORE-560 072
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ONKARAPPA N D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. RAVISHANKAR T V S/O VEERABHARDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/O NO.332, 5TH CROSS 5TH MAIN, BCC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 040
….RESPONDENT
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 25.08.2015 PASSED BY THE VI ADDL. PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU IN G & WC 108/2014 AT ANNEX-C AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY OF THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25.08.2015 PASSED IN G & WC 108/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT ANNEX-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The writ petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution since no steps are taken despite availing
four opportunities.
SD/JUDGE
RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court should be allowed after delay.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Anitha B M
Kumari Rachana D/o T V Ravishankar
Sri. Ravishankar T V
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
