The writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was disposed of as infructuous. No other relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.26955 OF 2015 (GM - RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. CHIVARO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., EMBASSY ICON ANNEXE, NO.2/2, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICE.
2
C.V. RAMANANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 093.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.R.SHASHIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24.6.2015 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE VII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE IN CRL. MISC. NO.1429/2014 ANNEX-Y AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as having rendered infructuous.
Placing the said submission on record, petition is
disposed off as having been infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
DS
M/s. Chivaro Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. State Bank of India
Dr. Chethan K.
Dr. Anitha S.
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
