Writ petition filed to quash a specific order and criminal proceedings. On preliminary hearing, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without substantive adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.13682 OF 2017(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. VINAYABANAKAR, W/O V. SHRIKANTH CHIPADI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, WORKING AS GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY DAVANAGERE – 577 002. RESIDING AT C/O DHANAJAY BANAKAR, SHRI SAI. KRISHNA KRUPA, MCC ‘A’ BLOCK, 10TH MAIN, DAVANAGERE – 577 002.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI: NAGENDRA NAIK R, ADV.)
AND:
2
DAVANGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE – 577 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ROHITH B.J., HCGP FOR R1; SRI.B.S.PRASAD, ADV., FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE - A DATED 13.2.2017 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ALSO THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.7/2014 REGISTERED BY R-2 AGAINST THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE – B AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
Smt. Vinayabanakar
The State of Karnataka Represented By Its Secretary (Mines)-2
The Superintendent of Police Karnataka Lokayuktha
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
