Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The Court recorded the withdrawal memo and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION No.16070 OF 2017 (GM – RES)
BETWEEN :
SRI. R. GOVINDARAJU, S/O C. RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT #238, 8TH MAIN ROAD, BYRASANDRA, JAYANAGAR, 1ST BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE - 560 011.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND :
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ROHITH B.J., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. VENKATESH S ARBATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01.03.2017 PASSED BY THE R-1 HEREIN (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
GRD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. R. Govindaraju
State of Karnataka Finance Department
The Additional Director General of Police
The Lokayuktha Police
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
