Dismissed
Shivu Masti Mukri S/O Masti Mukri v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/108417/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.108417 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No.108417 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.108417 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 108417 OF 2016 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally
signed by
VISHAL
NINGAPPA
VISHAL PATTIHAL
NINGAPPA Location:
PATTIHAL dharwad
Date:
2022.09.09
09:51:52
+0530
SHIVU MASTI MUKRI S/O. MASTI MUKRI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: ATTENDER, SDM COLLEGE, HONNAVAR, R/O: HARNIR, POST: DHARESHWAR, TQ: KUMTA, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.G. KADADAKATTI, ADVOCATE – ABSENT)
AND:
(BY SRI. VINAYAK S.KULKARNI, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DATED 03.04.2014, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
W.P. No.108417 of 2016
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
O R D E R
Advocate for the petitioner has filed a memo for retirement dated 27.02.2020 stating that the petitioner has taken back the writ papers with no objection vakalath to engage some other advocate in the matter.
None appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Vnp*
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Shivu Masti Mukri
The State of Karnataka
The Regional Joint Director for Collegiate Education
The Malnad Progressive Education Society
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court