In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 concerning the appointment as an Anganwadi Worker, the High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the selection of Respondent No. 4 over her.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.107731 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 107731 OF 2016 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed
by VISHAL
NINGAPPA
VISHAL PATTIHAL
NINGAPPA Location:
PATTIHAL DHARWAD
Date:
2022.09.07
10:52:42 +0530
RESHMA W/O. IMAMSAB KICHADI, AGE 26 YEARS, R/O: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GONAGANUR TOTA, POST: GONAGANUR, TALUK: RAMDURG, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H.M. DHARIGOND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VINAYAK S.KULKARNI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI AHAMED ALI RAHIMAN SHAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATED 18.02.2012, PASSED BY SECOND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ORDER DATED 28.07.2016, PASSED BY SECOND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-P AND ETC.,
W.P. No.107731 of 2016
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B-GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
O R D E R
W.P. No.107731 of 2016
application is also produced. Further, it is submitted that, in the order of merit list, respondent No.4 stood second and the petitioner herein stood third and as the person who had come first was not qualified, respondent No.4 has been selected.
Sd/JUDGE
Vnp* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim that the selection process was erroneous and the selected candidate was ineligible deserves interference under Articles 226 and 227.
Whether the magistrate found any error in the appointment of the selected candidate over the petitioner.
Reshma
State of Karnataka
Hasina
M. I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
