Subhash S/O Yallappa Kamble v. the Government of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
No.103641 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
No.103641 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.103641 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
W.P. NO.103641 OF 2016 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally
signed by
VISHAL
NINGAPPA
VISHAL PATTIHAL
NINGAPPA Location:
PATTIHAL DHARWAD
Date:
2022.09.07
10:53:34
+0530
SUBHASH S/O. YALLAPPA KAMBLE, AGE 33 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O: AMBEDKAR GALLI, POST: BELGUNDI, TAL & DIST: BELAGAVI.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI.MADHAV RAO V.CHAVAN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.VINAYAK S.KULKARNI, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. ANOOP G.DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4; RESPONDENT NO.3 - SERVED)
W.P. No.103641 of 2016
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTION STATEMENT DATED 26.10.2015 ANNEXURE-B WITHIN A STIPULATED PERIOD AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND INCONSIDERATION OF THE SAME THE RESPONDENT NO.3 SHALL BE DIRECTED TO UTILISE CORRECT ANSWER SHEETS TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PETITIONER TO DECLARE THEM AS QUALIFIED AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner. The writ petition is of the year 2016. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Vnp* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
SUBHASH S/O. YALLAPPA KAMBLE
THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALURU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court