Dismissed

Mrs Blossom Fernandez v. Somanath

Karnataka HC12 Oct 2022WA/1002/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a writ appeal filed pursuant to Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, which sought to set aside the order in Writ Petition No. 51879-881/2013. The dismissal followed a memo filed by the appellants seeking leave to withdraw the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn; pending interim applications were disposed of.

Mrs Blossom Fernandez Vs Somanath — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶7

WRIT APPEAL NO. 1002/2014 (LR-SEC 48)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MRS BLOSSOM FERNANDEZ W/O LATE MR. NEVILLE FERNANDEZ AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED, R/A A4 OURS SELECT PALI ROAD BANDRA (W), MUMBAI 400050 SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY THERE LR’S APPELLANTS NOS. 2 & 3 AS PER ORDER DATED 19/1/2022

¶10

MRS. MARIA FERNANDEZ D/O LATE MR.NEVILLE FERNANDEZ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A A4 OURS SELECT PALI ROAD BANDRA (W), MUMBAI-400050

¶11

MR. TREVOR FERNANDEZ S/O LATE MR. NEVILLE FERNANDEZ AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A A4 OURS SELECT PALI ROAD BANDRA (W), MUMBAI-400050 APPELLANT NOS. 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER CLARENCE PAIS.

¶12

¶13

...APPELLANTS

¶14

(BY SMT.DESIREE.M.PARIS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.VIVEK HOLLA FOR ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SOMANATH S/O LATE SANTHA SHETTY MAJOR

¶17

DEVAPPA S/O LATE SANTHA SHETTY MAJOR

¶18

1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING NEAR METAL BOX CO. JEPPU, MANGALORE-575001

¶19

THE LAND TRIBUNAL MANGALORE TALUK BY ITS CHAIRMAN HAMPANKATTA MANGALORE-575001

¶20

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LAND REFORMS AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDH, BANGALORE-560001

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI.M VISHWAJITH RAI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI.H.R.SHOWRI, AGA FOR R3 TO R4; V/O DTD 02/03/2016, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R1 IS ABATED)

¶23

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.51879-881/2013 DATED 6/12/2013.

¶24

THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, B.VEERAPPA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

¶25

¶26

J U D G M E N T

¶27

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 12.10.2022 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal duly signed by GPA holder of appellant Nos.2 and 3.

¶28

The memo is placed on record.

¶29

In view of the memo, the writ appeal is

¶30

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

In view of dismissal of the main appeal, all

¶32

pending I.A.s stands disposed of.

¶33

Sd/JUDGE

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

MBM

Mrs Blossom Fernandez v. Somanath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs Blossom Fernandez v. Somanath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Mahesh Ranka Vs Smt. Kushbu

T.Thyagaraj Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

S T Vijayakumar Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Smt. Mary Fernandez Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Manjula Vs Bandenawaj Gabasavalagi

The Managing Director Ksrtc Vs Smt Manjula