Dismissed

Sri Mahesh Ranka v. Smt. Kushbu

Karnataka HC11 Oct 2022WPHC/2/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Bengaluru disposed of a habeas corpus petition filed by a father seeking custody of a minor child. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to agitate the same rights in another pending suit.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to agitate his rights in G & WC No.218/2020.

Sri Mahesh Ranka Vs Smt. Kushbu — Child Custody and Guardianship | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

WPHC No. 2 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. S. HEMALEKHA

¶9

WRIT PETITION HABEAS CORPUS NO. 2 OF 2021

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI MAHESH RANKA, S/O SRI KANHAIYALAL RANKA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.1104, PADMA NIVAS, 8^TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI 1^ST STAGE, BENGALURU-560050.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. B. B. SAGAR., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by USHA NAGENAHALLI SHANMUKHAPPA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

SMT. KUSHBU W/O MR. VINOD PAGARIYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT C/O MR. KISHORE KUMAR JI PAGARIYA, VASANTH LAWNS, TOWER I, NO.103-104, SAVANNAH, NEAR JUPITER HOSPITAL, EASTERN EXPRESS HIGH WAY, THANE WEST, MUMBAI-400601.

¶17

ALSO R/AT SMT. KUSHBU, W/O MR. VINOD PAGARIYA,

¶18

¶19

WPHC No. 2 of 2021

¶20

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O NEMICHAND MANDOTH, PERFECTA CHARMS APARTMENTS, NO.273, FLAT NO.303, 3^RD FLOOR, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560018. AND ALSO R/AT SMT. KUSHBU, W/O MR. VINOD PAGARIYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PAGARIYA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., JAIHIND BUILDING, NO.1, BLOCK NO.1-B, 2^ND FLOOR, DR. A. M. ROAD, BHULESWAR, MUMBAI-400002.

¶21

2. MR. VINOD PAGARIYA, S/O HASTIMAL PAGARIYA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, PAGARIYA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., JAIHIND BUILDING, NO.1, BLOCK NO.1-B, 2^ND FLOOR, DR. A. M. ROAD, BHULESHWAR, MUMBAI-400002. AND ALSO R/AT MR. VINOD PAGARIYA, S/O HASTIMAL PAGARIYA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT C/O MR. KISHORE KUMAR JI PAGARIYA, VASANTH LAWNS, TOWER I, NO.103-104, SAVANNAH, NEAR JUPITER HOSPITAL, EASTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, THANE WEST, MUMBAI-400601. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMANTHANAGARA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560050.

¶22

¶23

WPHC No. 2 of 2021

¶24

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAMARAJAPET POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560018.

¶25

…RESPONDENT

¶26

(BY SRI S.I. GOUTHAM CHAND, ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 19.01.2021 R2 TO R4 DELETED)

¶27

THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS NOS.1 AND 2 TO PRODUCE THE MINOR CHILD NAMELY KUMARI JAGRUTI BEFORE THIS COURT AND HANDOVER THE CUSTODY OF THE MINOR CHILD KUMARI JAGRUTI IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER.

¶28

THIS WPHC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, B.VEERAPPA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

O R D E R

¶30

The learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 11^th October, 2022 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition habeas corpus with liberty to agitate his rights in G & WC No.218/2020 in accordance with law. The same is taken on record.

¶31

¶32

WPHC No. 2 of 2021

¶33

In view of the memo, writ petition habeas corpus is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to agitate his rights in G & WC No.218/2020 in accordance with law.

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

Sd/JUDGE

¶36

Nsu/-

Sri Mahesh Ranka v. Smt. Kushbu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Mahesh Ranka v. Smt. Kushbu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri a S Guruprasad Vs the Managing Director

Royal Sundaram Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sri. G. Hari Babu

Tata Aig General Vs Smt P Rukmini

T.Thyagaraj Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

S T Vijayakumar Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Smt.Arati Vs Superintendent of Police