Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 CPC. The appellant was absent in court and failed to file paper books despite granted time. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of appellant and failure to file paper books.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.905/2013
BETWEEN:
SMT. UMA, W/O. SHARAVANA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESIDING AT GANDHINAGAR, MUNNEKOLLALU, MUDDINAPALYA, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560 037.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.MALLIKARJUNA R.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O. LATE L.BASAVACHARI, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2227/7, 2ND CROSS, KUVEMPUNAGAR, CHANNAPATNA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT . PIN CODE:571 501. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H.C SHIVARAMU., ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
2
DATED:15.12.2012 PASSED IN OS NO. 4832/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
None present on behalf of the appellant, even in the second round of calling the case. The appeal is of the year 2013. Despite granting sufficient time, paper books have not been filed. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
HJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Uma, W/o. Sharavana
Smt. Susheelamma W/o. Late L. Basavachari
V. Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
