The Court disposed of the revision appeal filed against a money recovery decree after the parties filed a joint memo and the appellant tendered Rs.91,000/-, resulting in the modification of the trial decree.
The decree was modified in terms of the joint memo; the appeal was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
R.F.A.No.794/2012(MON)
BETWEEN:
BANGALORE DOR-TECH PVT. LTD., # 53, DEFENCE COLONY, 100 FT. ROAD, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE -560 038 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.B.M.POOVAIAH ..APPELLANT
(BY SRI.ANOOP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.S.S.SRINIVASA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR M/s.LEXICON)
AND:
SRI.NINGASWAMY G.N. S/O LATE G.K.NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT # 23, "SHIVASMRUTHI" NEAR VINAYAKA SUNRISE SCHOOL KEMAPURA, HEBBAL BANGALORE -560 024. ..RESPONDENT (BY SRI.RAMESH UPADHYAYA, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.02.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.7280/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, PARTLY DECREED THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel
for respondent present a joint memo.
bearing No.241158 dated 10.08.2022 for a sum of Rs.91,000/- is tendered by the learned counsel for appellant to the learned counsel for respondent. Learned counsel for respondent accepts the same.
3
court stands modified in terms of the joint memo and appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
SBN
Bangalore Dor-Tech Pvt. Ltd.
Sri. Ningaswamy G.N.
V. Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
