Sri Venkatesh v. Sri Munivenkatappa
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
R.F.A. No.566/2020 [PAR]
BETWEEN:
2
PIN CODE-562 102. [DIED, NO LR’S]
(BY SRI.RAMESHA.B.N., ADV.)
AND:
3
4
DODDABALLAPUR TOWN BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-561203.
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.10.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.429/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., DODDABALLAPURA REJECTING THE PLAINT OF THIS SUIT SINCE THE SUIT IS HIT BY SECTION 117 OF LIMITATION ACT AND ALSO SECTION 6[1] [3] AND [5] OF HINDU SUCCESSIONS OF AMENDMENT ACT, 2005.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Shri.Ramesha B.N., learned advocate for the
appellants has filed a memo dated 24.03.2022 duly
5
signed by the appellants and learned advocate for the appellants seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
mpk/-* CT:bms
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VENKATESH
MUNIRATHNAMMA @ RATHNAMMA
RATHNAMMA
NAGAMMA
CHIKKANAGAMMA @ NAGAMMA
MUNIVENKATAPPA
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
UMESH M ADIGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court