This appeal against a dismissal of a partition suit was dismissed outright by the High Court of Karnatak for failure by the appellant to comply with office objections.
Appeal dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
R.F.A. No.1575/2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
MRS. JACINTHA VIOLET YADU WIFE OF DR.YADU KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, D/O.MARIYAMMA, RESIDING AT NO.2381, CHANDRANAGAR, 13TH MAIN, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560078 (REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER)
SMT.DHANALAKSHMI R W/O GNANA MURTHY S, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2381, CHANDRANAGAR, 13TH MAIN, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560078. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI FAYAZ SAB B G, ADV.)
2
AND:
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.114, 3RD MAIN, BEML 5TH STAGE, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560098.
…RESPONDENTS
RFA FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2016 PASSED IN O.S NO.25/2015 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, CHALLAKERE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
3
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellants. This appeal is of
the year 2016.
office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
mpk/-* CT:bms
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MRS. JACINTHA VIOLET YADU
SMT.DHANALAKSHMI R
SRI. JAYASHEELA
SMT. REKHA
SMT. AMMI
SRI KIRAN S
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
UMESH M ADIGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
