The Karnataka High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC due to non-prosecution, noting that paper books were not filed and costs remained unpaid.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
R.F.A.No.334 OF 2014 (DEC-INJ)
BETWEEN
1 . SMT. PANKAJA PRABHU W/O SRI.M.R.PRABHU SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.764, 23RD MAIN ROAD, SECOND PHASE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078 REPRESENTED BY HER SPA HOLDER SRI.M.R.PRABHU SWAMY.
...APPELLANTS
(V/O DATED 24.03.2016 APPEAL AGAINST APPELLANT NO.1 IS ABATED; V/O DATED 24.08.2022, SRI.D.N.MANJUNATH, ADV. FOR APPELLANT NO.2 RETIRES)
2
AND
3
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI L S VENKATA KRISHNA, ADV. FOR R1; SRI.K.VIJAYAKUMAR, ADV. FOR R3 AND R4; R5 MINOR, REPT. BY R4; V/O DATED 24.03.2016 - APPEAL AGAINST R2 (A-D) IS DISMISSED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.1.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4731/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE 24TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION, MANDATORY INJUNCTION, PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a
memo of retirement.
Sd/JUDGE
MH/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. PANKAJA PRABHU
SRI.M.R.PRABHU SWAMY
SMT.B.K. LAKSHMI BAI
SRI K.SHANTHARAJU LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
SRI.K.BHASKAR RAJU
SMT.ASHWINI.B
V. SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
