Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sri Munegowda Vs Sri G Anand — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2022)

Home
Karnataka HC
2022
Sri Munegowda Vs Sri G AnandSri Munegowda v. Sri G Anand

Dismissed

Sri Munegowda v. Sri G Anand

Karnataka HC23 Aug 2022RFA/121/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against dismissal of suit for permanent injunction dismissed for non-prosecution as appellant was absent and did not file required documents.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA

R.F.A.No.121/2014(INJ)

BETWEEN:

SRI. MUNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANSWAMY, R/AT. CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE, BANASAWADI POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560043

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE AND SRI. JAGADEESH M.L., ADVOCATES)

AND:

SRI. G. ANAND AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O SRI.SESHAGIRI RAO, NO.2, MUNISWAMY LAYOUT, OLD MADRAS ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560008.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
SRI. MUNEGOWDA
respondent
SRI. G. ANAND
respondent
SRI. NARAYANASWAMY

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 23 Aug 2022 · August
Registered: 21 Jan 2014
Case no.: RFA/121/2014

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V Srishananda

M/S Canara Housing Development Vs Sri Y R Balakrishna
22 Aug 2022
Mu Sigma Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Mathcompany Pvt. Ltd.
22 Aug 2022
B Jayalakshmi Vs Dr Leela
22 Aug 2022
Sri M Chandra Vs Smt Papamma
23 Aug 2022

Cite this judgement

Sri Munegowda v. Sri G Anand, RFA/121/2014 (KA), decided on 23 August 2022.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V. SRISHANANDA

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

RFA No.121/2014 held that appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of appellant and failure to file acknowledgement or paper books.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

SRI. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, S/O.LATE THAYANNA, R/AT.CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE, BANASAWADI POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,

2

BANGALORE-560043.

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.KORE BASANNA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1, R-2 -SERVED)

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI, RULE-1 AND SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.09.2013 PASSED IN O.S.No.8669/2007 ON THE FILE OF XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Case called thrice. None present on behalf of the appellant.

Acknowledgement not filed for having deposited cost of Rs.500/- vide order dated 26.07.2022 and paper

books not filed.

Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SBN

V. SRISHANANDA

CNR

KAHC010096482014

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

K S Geetha @ Muktha Vs Vasudeva Rao

23 Aug 2022

H R Rajeeva Vs H R Range Gowda

23 Aug 2022