The High Court of Karnataka disposed of Regular First Appeal No. 1748 of 2017 by dismissing the appeal filed against a decree for specific performance, noting non-compliance with a peremptory order.
The appeal is dismissed. No further order is required. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1748 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M. ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1748 OF 2017 (SP)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI. M.S. ARUNACHALAM SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HIS L.R MRS. D. MALATHI W/O LATE M.S. ARUNACHALAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.154, 155, 6TH MAIN HANUMAGIRI LAYOUT, BSK, 5TH STAGE BANGALORE-560 061. …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. V. RENJITH SHANKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MRS. SIENTHI KATHRINE OBED W/O LATE ABONG IMLONG AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/A NO:C-102 ADARSH GARDENS JAYANGAR, 8TH BLOCK BANGALORE-560 011. …RESPONDENT
RFA FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.07.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.16527/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
RFA No. 1748 of 2017
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Peremptory order dated 23.04.2021 is not complied
with. Learned advocate for the appellant again seeks time.
Hence, no further order is required.
The appeal stands dismissed.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
YN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
SRI. M.S. ARUNACHALAM SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HIS L.R MRS. D. MALATHI
MRS. SIENTHI KATHRINE OBED
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
UMESH M. ADIGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
