The Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC was disposed of by granting the appellant leave to withdraw the appeal and dismissing it.
Leave to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1270 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1270 OF 2021 (MON)
BETWEEN:
(BY SMT. HIREMATH AKKAMAHADEVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RFA No. 1270 of 2021
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2017 PASSED IN OS No.2/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, C. N. HALLI, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AS PER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COMPROMISE PETITION.
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt.Akkamahadevi Hiremath, learned advocate for the appellants has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
YN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri G Lokesh S/o N. Gopalkrishna Setty and Ors.
M/s Sri Enterprises Jogihalli Gate and Ors.
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
Umesh M Adiga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
