This recording of the original order in a response filed under Section 96 CPC granted the appellant leave to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with directions for court fee refund.
Leave to withdraw the appeal was granted; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
R.F.A. No.1481/2018 [DEC/INJ]
BETWEEN:
SRI.GOVINDARAJU.B. S/O RAGHAVAIAH NAIDU.B AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO.67, 7TH MAIN 4TH CROSS, SYNDICATE BANK COLONY BSK III STAGE BANGALORE-560085. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.BHANUPRAKASH.V.G., ADV.)
AND:
SRI.NARASIMHA SWAMY S/O NARASIMHAMURTHY.C.N., AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.70, “SKANDA KRUPA” RAGAVENDRA LAYOUT PADMANABHA NAGAR 12 ‘A’ CROSS, 22ND MAIN BANGALORE-560070. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.MAHESH.S, C/R.)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.06.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2798/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
2
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Shri V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned advocate for the appellant has filed a memo dated 02.09.2022 seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
with law.
No costs.
SD/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
mpk/-* CT:bms
SRI.GOVINDARAJU.B.
SRI.NARASIMHA SWAMY
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
UMESH M ADIGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
