Regular first appeal against a Commercial Courts decree dismissed for non-prosecution on the ground that office objections regarding maintainability were sustained.
Declined
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. 1098 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1098 OF 2021 (MON)
BETWEEN:
SRI K. RANGACHARI S/O KRISHNACHARI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROPRIETOR SRI RANGANATHASWAMY JEWELLERY WORKS R/O PAVAGADA ROAD OPP VYSYA BANK CHALLAKERE TOWN CHITRADURGA …APPELLANT (BY SHRI. C.N. SRINIVAS RAO, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
SRI MAHIPAL JAIN S/O MOHANLAL AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS ARIHANTH JEWELLERS, D.NO.17 KALIKADEVI ROAD, DAVANAGERE CITY DAVANAGERE DISTRICT …RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.02.2021 PASSED IN COM.OS.No.1/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURTS) CHITRADURGA, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
RFA No. 1098 of 2021
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant.
been passed by the Commercial Court. Hence, office objections with regard to maintainability is sustained.
Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
YN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29
SRI K. RANGACHARI
SRI MAHIPAL JAIN
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
UMESH M ADIGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
