Dismissed

Smt Rudramma v. Chandrashekar K Alias Chandrappa K

Karnataka HC12 Nov 2022MFA/919/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

National Lok Adalat disposed of a first appeal against a motor vehicle accident compensation award. After settlement negotiations, the Corporation agreed to pay an enhanced lump sum of Rs. 55,000/- with interest provisions, settling the claim in full and final settlement.

What did the court decide?

A lump sum of Rs. 55,000/- to be paid as enhanced compensation with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of default if not deposited within six weeks.

Smt Rudramma Vs Chandrashekar K Alias Chandrappa K — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.M.JOSHI AND SRI. VIJAYKUMAR MAJAGE, MEMBER

¶7

M.F.A.No. 919/2022 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 3014/2022)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT RUDRAMMA W/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCCU: TAILOR NOW NIL R/O 2ND MAIN ROAD, K R NAGARA HARIHAR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 601 ...APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI.G.J.SUNKAPUR., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

CHANDRASHEKAR K ALIAS CHANDRAPPA K DRIVER OF BUS K.S.R.T.C NO: KA17/F-1701 BELONGING TO DAVANAGERE DEPOT - 577 001

¶13

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC

¶14

DAVANAGERE DEPOT - 577 001

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI.NEELAKANTAREDDY B PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 AND 2)

¶17

¶18

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:13.12.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.302/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT, HARIHARA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION

¶19

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶20

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶21

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present through video conferencing/Physical Hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Corporation along with its representative are present.

¶22

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Corporation and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Corporation has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.55,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the claims tribunal, in full and final settlement of the

¶23

¶24

claim. We are satisfied that the settlement is just, proper and reasonable.

¶25

The Respondent - Corporation has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶26

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification.

¶27

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment of the Tribunal shall stands modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶28

Sd/JUDGE

¶29

Sd/MEMBER

¶30

Smt Rudramma v. Chandrashekar K Alias Chandrappa K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Rudramma v. Chandrashekar K Alias Chandrappa K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Mohan D Vs Mr. Krishna

Narasimhegowda P C Vs Subramanya Rao

Mahadevaiah Vs Manjunath S P

Rajanna Vs Sri R Somashekar

Devendra Naik Vs Smt Gangadevi G

S.B.Badrinath Vs Ajay H.R.