Disposed

S.B.Badrinath v. Ajay H.R.

Karnataka HC12 Nov 2022MFA/6206/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, the National Lok Adalat settled a motor accident first appeal between S.B. Badrinath and National Insurance Company Ltd. A lump sum of Rs. 1,00,000 was agreed upon as enhanced compensation, to be deposited with interest at 9% per annum if not paid within six weeks. The appeal was disposed of based on the joint settlement memo.

What did the court decide?

Agreement to pay an additional lump sum of Rs. 1,00,000 as enhanced compensation with 9% interest on default; award modified.

S.B.Badrinath Vs Ajay H.R. — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 12^th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA

¶7

¶8

SRI. VIVEK SUBBA REDDY, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 6206/2022 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 3196/2022)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

S.B. Badrinath S/o S.G. Balakrishana, Now aged about 28 years, R/at No.74, Model House, 3^rd Street, N.R. Colony, Basavanagudi, Bangalore South – 560 004. ...APPELLANT

¶12

(By Sri. Raghu R., Advocate)

¶13

AND

¶14

Ajay H.R. S/o Ramamoorthi H.R., Now aged about 29 years, R/at No.314, 6^th Main Road, B.S.K. 1^st Stage, Shrinagara, Banashankari Post, Bangalore – 560 050.

¶15

The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd.,

¶16

¶17

Udupi Divisional Office, Udupi – 574 118. RESPONDENTS

¶18

(By Sri. Janardhan Reddy, Advocate for R-2)

¶19

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.09.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO. 129/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM AND MACT, KARKALA, UDUPI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶20

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶21

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present through video conferencing/physical hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶23

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh

¶24

¶25

only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶26

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶27

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant/claimant, on proper identification.

¶28

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶29

Sd/JUDGE

¶30

Sd/MEMBER

¶31

Rbv

S.B.Badrinath v. Ajay H.R.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.B.Badrinath v. Ajay H.R.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Mohan D Vs Mr. Krishna

Narasimhegowda P C Vs Subramanya Rao

Mahadevaiah Vs Manjunath S P

Rajanna Vs Sri R Somashekar

Devendra Naik Vs Smt Gangadevi G

Rohan Vs Ganapati