The Karnataka High Court dismissed an appeal filed against an interim injunction order, as the original suit was subsequently withdrawn by the plaintiff.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
MFA NO.7711 OF 2019 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
:: 2 ::
…Appellants
(By Sri Chandrashekar Patil, Advocate)
AND:
N.A.Anjinappa S/o Late Appaianna, Aged about 70 years, R/at Nagamangala Village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District-562110.
…Respondent
This MFA is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC, against the order dated 30.05.2019 passed on I.A.No.2 and 4 in O.S.No.188/2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, allowing I.A.No.2 and 4 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC.
This MFA coming on for orders through video conferencing this day, the Court made the following:
:: 3 ::
ORDER
Appellants’ counsel is present. He has filed a memo stating that this appeal does not survive as the suit O.S.No.188/2016 has been withdrawn by the plaintiff. Memo is placed on record. This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
sd
M/s. Udhyaman Investments Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Nam Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Sri V.S.Aravindan
V.S.Singarachari
V.S.Ramanjam
N.A.Anjinappa
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
