In CRP No. 465 of 2021, the petitioner filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC. Counsel withdrew the petition via memo. The Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP No. 465 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 465 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR /AR MR.RAVI PRAKASH CHAMRIA
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SMT. RAMA RAMACHANDRA IYER, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. V.S. MAHADEVAN.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING
CRP No. 465 of 2021
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2020 REJECTING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated
22.10.2021 with a prayer to withdraw the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
VMB
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S. PROLITUS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
M/S. SOLIZE INDIA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
V MANJUSHA BAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
