The Karnataka High Court dismissed two connected Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of the CPC. The petitions, challenging orders in an underlying election petition, were declared infructuous and dismissed without detailed reasoning on the merits.
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.118 OF 2016 CONNECTED WITH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.106 OF 2016
CRP No.118 OF 2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI H.P. RAGHAVENDRA S/O. SRI H.P. PUTTARAMAIAH H.N. AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT MARUTHI NAGARA SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 127.
... PETITIONER
(BY MS. K. SHAMA NARGUND, FOR SMT. SONA VAKKUND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 127.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V. RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R.1 TO R.3; R.4 TO R.7 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.02.2016 PASSED ON I.A. NO.3 IN THE ELECTION PETITION NO.1/2015 AND CONSEQUENTLY REJECT THE ELECTION PETITION NO.1/2015 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC., MAGADI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
CRP No.106 OF 2016:
BETWEEN:
S. BASAPPAJI S/O. SRI SAMBASHIVAIAH AGED 46 YEARS R/O. SOLUR, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 127.
... PETITIONER
(BY MS. K. SHAMA NARGUND, FOR SMT. SONA VAKKUND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V. RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R.1 TO R.3; R.4 TO R.7 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.03.2016 PASSED ON I.A. NO.4 IN THE ELECTION PETITION NO.1/2015 AND CONSEQUENTLY REJECT THE ELECTION PETITION NO.1/2015 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MAGADI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitions have become infructuous and the same may be dismissed. She also undertakes to file a memo in this regard.
Submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as having
become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
VMB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of CPC become infructuous requiring their dismissal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI H.P. RAGHAVENDRA S/O. SRI H.P. PUTTARAMAIAH H.N.
S. BASAPPAJI S/O. SRI SAMBASHIVAIAH
SRI N.R. SHARMA @ T.S. NAGA RUDRA SHARMA
SRI K.Y. PEDDANNA S/O. SRI YELLAPPA
SMT. T. NAGARATHNAMMA W/O. SRI M. NAGARAJU
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
