Criminal Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings. Counsel submitted the petition became infructuous and undertook to file a memo. Court quashed the petition as having become infructuous.
Criminal Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1565 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
MR. BHASKARA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O. BOLLU POOJARY DODDAKEREBETTU MANE HIRIAKA POST, UDUPI TALUK - 576 113.
... PETITIONER
(BY SMT. VIJAYA KUMARI, ADVOCATE FOR DR. S. ARMUGHAM, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE BY SHO HIRIADKA POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY THE S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF HIRIADKA POLICE, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI IN NO.26/SECURITY CASE/ HIRIADKA STATION/2019/ 112/18-19 ON 18.02.2019 AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE SUBSEQUENT SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE LEARNED EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE VIDE NO.M.A.G./C.C./C.C.R.112/18-19 DATED 20.02.2019 AT ANNEXURE-C.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed accordingly. She undertakes to file a memo in this regard.
become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
VMB
3 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be quashed due to non-filing of memo.
Whether petitioner's counsel undertaking to file memo renders petition infructuous.
Whether impugned proceedings under Hiriadka Police station need quashing.
MR. BHASKARA POOJARY
THE STATE
M.I. ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
