Sri Irshad Pasha v. M/S Lotus Farms
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had not appeared, counsel filed no proof of retention, and no admission bond was executed.
The Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had not appeared, counsel filed no proof of retention, and no admission bond was executed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.507/2019
BETWEEN:
SRI IRSHAD PASHA S/O MOHAMMED PASHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, PROPRIETOR HMS CHICKEN CENTRE SHOP NO.11TH CROSS, SRINIVAS BUILDING, AGRAHARA LAYOUT, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SUHAIB FAZEEL M., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
M/S. LOTUS FARMS REPT. BY SRI.K.SIMHAM REDDY, S/O LATE K.LAKSHMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 EYARS, NO.12A, ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI M.D.ALAVANDAR, ADVOCATE [THROUGH V.C.])
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W. SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.02.2019, PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.1602/2017 BY THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU, WHEREIN THE APPEAL WAS
2
DISMISSED AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 06.10.2017 PASSED IN C.C.NO.8868/2015 BY THE HON'BLE XXVII A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU, CONSEQUENTLY, PETITIONER MAY BE ACQUITTED FROM THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.
for retirement along with postal receipt and the counsel has not
even produced the letter sent to the petitioner and also the postal acknowledgment. Hence, memo for retirement filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is rejected.
has also not executed any bond before the Trial Court, after filing of this revision petition.
Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Irshad Pasha
M/s. Lotus Farms
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court