Dismissed
Smt K P Bramarambha v. N Shivanna
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/220/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.220/2019
BETWEEN:
SMT. K.P.BRAMARAMBHA W/O LATE SIDDAGANGAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.15, K.G.NAGAR, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, NEAR GARDEN ENGLISH SCHOOL, ADJACENT TO RMP APARTMENTS, T.DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560057. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI DEVI PRASAD, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
N. SHIVANNA S/O LATE NANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.78, HULIYURAMMA DEVI NILAYA, K.G.NAGAR, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, NEAR GARDEN ENGLISH SCHOOL, T.DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560057. ...RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W. SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER AND JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HON’BLE XX A.C.M.M BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.19137/2017 D.D. 19.10.2018 AND RESTORATION OF THE CRL.A.NO.2213/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
2
BENGALURU (CCH-57) ORDER DATED 01.02.2019, THE HON’BLE COURT HAS VACATED THE STAY.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This Court, vide order dated 07.04.2022 observed that though this matter is listed fourth time for compliance of office objections, the office objections are not complied. However, one more opportunity was given to comply with the office objections and it was also made clear that, if office objections are not complied, the petition will be dismissed. Inspite of an opportunity being given, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not complied with the office objections.
Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. K.P. Bramarambha
N. Shivanna
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court