The Court dismissed the criminal petition under Section 439 CrPC to enlarge the petitioner on bail, as the petitioner's counsel was absent and office objections were not complied with despite five opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8477/2022
BETWEEN:
HEMANTH .B SON OF BANDIAH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS RESIDENT OF BELLANDAMADAGU MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMAKURU-572 101 ….PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR .R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TUMAKURU WOMEN POLICE STATION REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BANGALORE-560 001 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.28/2022 REGISTERED BY TUMAKURU WOMEN POLICE STATION, TUMAKURU, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/Ss. 376 AND 363 OF IPC AND SECTION 6 OF POCSO ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTSC-1), TUMAKURU IN SPL.C.NO.142/2022.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.
It is noticed from the order sheet that, office objections are not complied in spite of granting five opportunities. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KGR* CT:NR
Hemanth .B
The State of Karnataka
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
