Criminal petition under Section 439 CrPC for bail was dismissed as the counsel was absent and there was no representation from the petitioner, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5991/2022
BETWEEN:
SOURABH MESTRI S/O LATE. SUKUMAR AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT: RESIDING AT NO.34/B NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE GEDDALAHALLI, SANJAYNAGAR BENGALURU-560 094 ….PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJ .D, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; R2- SERVED)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL.C.C.NO.1855/2021 (CR.NO.193/2021) OF SANJAY NAGAR P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/Ss. 6 AND 8 OF POCSO ACT AND SEC.376 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE FTSC-II BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner called-out. Absent.
The order sheet reveals that, all along there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KGR*
CT:NR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial for offences under POCSO Act and IPC 376.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SOURABH MESTRI
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SANJAYNAGAR POLICE STATION REP.
RATHNAMMA .R
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
