This single judge order dismissed the criminal petition seeking anticipatory bail as infructuous. The Court held that since the proceedings were already quashed in a related petition and the matter was settled, no relief was necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.791/2022
BETWEEN:
NAGARJUNA G.S., S/O SRI SHIVARAMU G.C, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.987, M.M. ROAD GUTHALU, ARKESHWARANGARAG GUTHALU, GUTTALU, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-571403. … PETITIONER
(BY MS. HEENA S.A., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SANTOSH S. GOGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH BASAVANAGUDI WOMEN POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001. … RESPONDENT
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR STATE SRI ARUN G. FOR DEFACTO COMPLAINANT)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.211/2021 OF BASAVANAGUDI WOMEN P.S., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 376, 504 AND 506 OF IPC.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter has been settled and also criminal proceedings has been quashed in Crl.P.No.3835/2022 and in view of the quashing of the proceedings, the petition has become infructuous.
infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MD
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is infructuous following the quashing of related proceedings.
Whether the petition should be allowed or dismissed given the settlement and quashing order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Crl.P.No.3835/2022Referred¶18
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nagarjuna G.S.
The State of Karnataka
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
