incident of murder was committed on 15.10.2021. The learned counsel submits that this petitioner was using two mobile phones and he was in constant touch with accused Nos.2 to 4. Both the SIMS are seized at the instance of the petitioner herein. The learned counsel submits that all of them stayed together in a lodge and when accused Nos.3 and 4 were caught hold of by general public at the spot, accused No.5 made a phone call to accused No.4 by using his mobile No.96183 85966 and he spoke with him for about 101 seconds, 194 seconds, 246 seconds and 64 seconds. The tower location is also particularly in respect of place of incident. The learned counsel submits that he also called accused No.3 and spoke to him for more than for 266 seconds i.e., at 8.23 p.m. and this petitioner called accused No.4 also at 8.44 p.m. and again he called accused No.3 at 8.55 p.m. and tower location is clear that all of them were together and committed the murder, but when accused Nos.3 and 4 were caught hold of by the public, this petitioner left the place and hence there is a prima facie material before the Court that before committing the murder all of them were in constant touch from 01.10.2021 till the date of committing the murder. Though there is no recovery, CDR report is clear that this
