In this criminal appeal, the High Court of Karnataka, observing that the appellant filed no representation and lacked interest in prosecuting the appeal, dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 616 of 2018 for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.616 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SMT RATHNA L W/O D KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.101/33, 21ST MAIN NEAR RAVI GAS AGENCY PADMANABHANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 070
...COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R.SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND
SRI KRISHNA S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.70-24/1,1ST FLOOR GANESHA TEMPLE ROAD, TATA SILK FARM, (NEAR VENKATESHWARA TEMPLE) BENGALURU - 560 028
.... ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BAGOJI VIJAYAKUMAR GURAPPA, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.02.2018 PASSED IN C.C.NO.28628/2016 BY LEARNED XVI A.C.M.M. BANGALORE AND IT IS FURTHER PRAYED TO KINDLY CONVICT THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 138 OF N.I.ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
2
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for appellant.
afternoon session.
that if there is no representation for appellant today also, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
RR
Smt Rathna L
Sri Krishna
J.M. Khazi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
