The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Criminal Appeal No.1596 of 2018 for default, noting the lack of representation from the appellant despite a last warning order.
Appeal dismissed for default of not complying with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1596 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. THIMMAPPA GOWDA S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANDIGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK - 562 123, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
… COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAVICHANDRA T C, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SRI. K. R. SRIDHARA S/O. LATE K. Y. RAMANUJAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT MIG-20, K.H.B. COLONY, KUNIGAL TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130.
...ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.06.2018 PASSED BY III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT RAMANAGARA IN CRL. APPEAL NO.29/2017 AND RESTORE THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.03.2017 PASSED BY ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC OF MAGADI IN C.C.NO.5/2017 AND ALLOW THIS PETITION WITH COSTS IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellant.
representation for the appellant.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for default of not complying with the office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
MDS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. G. THIMMAPPA GOWDA
SRI. K. R. SRIDHARA
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
