Prakash v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Criminal Petition No. 6053/2022 for non-prosecution when the petitioner's counsel was absent and court costs remained unpaid.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6053/2022
BETWEEN:
PRAKASH S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT SHAREEF COLONY VILLAGE H.D.KOTE, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 114. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI PRABHUSWAMY, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
STATE BY H.D.KOTE POLICE, MYSURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. … RESPONDENT
(BY SRI H.S.SHANKAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN C.C.NO.184/2022 (CR.NO.337/2021) OF H.D.KOTE P.S., MYSURU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/Ss.341, 114, 302, 120B R/W. SECTION 34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND J.M.F.C., COURT AT H.D.KOTE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakash S/o Krishnappa
- respondent
State
Coram
H.P. SANDESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/6053/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court