Due to the appellant's failure to furnish the correct address and no representation appearing, the Criminal Appeal was dismissed for default.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.600 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SRI. C.RAJANNA S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, RESIDING AT NO.40, BETTENAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL - 562 110.
…COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MAHESH S, ADVOCATE FOR MAHESH & CO., - ABSENT)
AND:
VISIONZ MEDIA REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR.PALANI HRISHIKESH, NO.44, LAKSHMI NIVASA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, MARUTHI MANDIR WARD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040 PRESENTLY ALSO AT KADABAGERE, SUNKADAKATTE MAIN ROAD, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 023
.....ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
2
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 04.02.2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXII ADDL. CMM, BANGALORE CITY, IN CRIMINAL CASE NO.1393/2012 AND CONVICT THE RESPONDENT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellant.
3
correct address. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for default for not complying with the office objections.
Sd/-
Mds.
SRI. C.RAJANNA
VISIONZ MEDIA
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
