This is the order in Criminal Appeal No. 17 of 2019. Due to the appellant's failure to comply with office objections within the granted time, the appeal was dismissed for default.
appealed dismissed for default for not complying with office objections
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SRI RAGHAVENDRA T N W/O LATE NAGARAJ SHETTY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT 1ST BLOCK, BYCHANAHALLY, KUSHALNAGAR, POST AND HOBLI, SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT PIN - 571 234
… COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT (BY SRI. SATHISH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S.S.PALAKSHA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SMT NIRMALA C K @ RATNA W/O LATE MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/AT CHIKKATTURU VILLAGE HARANGI ROAD KUDAMANGALORE POST, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI, SOMWARPETE TLAUK KODAGU PIN - 571 234
...ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 15.11.2018 ON THE FILE OF C.C.NO.1009/2015 PASSED BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
2
FIRST CLASS AT KUSHALNAGAR AND ALTERNATIVELY CONVICT THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT, 1881, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for appellant.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for default for not complying with the office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RR
SRI RAGHAVENDRA T N
SMT NIRMALA C K
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
